OVERVIEW
This presentation
will cover the speaker’s personal views and experiences with innovations in medical education over the past 13 years
with special emphasis on an integrated curriculum and student-centered problem-based learning. Besides presenting a proposed
medical curriculum, the presentation also addresses issues of student assessment. The contents of this presentation have been
adapted from papers and presentations published by the author on his website.
1.0 OLD PERFUME IN NEW BOTTLES or NEW PERFUME IN OLD BOTTLES
1.1 Evolution vs. revolution:
When we
talk about modern trends in medical education we need to understand that we are not dealing with revolutionary phenomena but
rather evolutionary ones. We are engaged in a process of changing, adjusting, and improving while responding to rapid changes
in the medical education environment. In this process we may modify and update old approaches. We may also discard new approaches
that are not working and go back to old ones. We may also innovate new approaches unknown before. These will also become modified
with time as the educational and scientific environments changes.
1.2 Problem-based learning: a historical perspective:
The use
of problem-based learning and student-directed learning are not new trends discovered this century. During the era of revelation,
‘ahad al risaalat, The Qur’anic method of instruction was essentially
problem-based and prophetic teaching reflected most features recognized today as student-centeredness.
The Qur’an
in the order we read it today existed in the lawh al mahfudh. Its chronological
revelation did not follow that order. It was revealed gradually over a period of 23 years. A verse was revealed when a specific
and relevant problem arose in the community. Scholars of the Qur’an such as Jalal al Dddin al Suyuuti (d. 911 H) wrote
extensive books on the reasons for revelation, asbaab al nuzuul, which were the
problems to be solved. This method of revelation ensured that the first generation of Muslims understood the Qur’an
in a deep way because its verses were tied to actual practical problems that they had experienced.
1.3 Student-centered learning: a historical perspective:
Student
directed learning was also prevalent during the era of revelation. Books of siirat
record that the prophet used to speak little when sitting with his companions. He used to listen to them as they discussed in a sort of self directed learning. Many of the recorded hadith from the prophet
were actually affirmations, iqraar, of the conclusions that the companions reached
if they were valid. If they were not, he used to correct them. It is also recorded that the prophet used to teach his companions
by asking them questions such that they were active and not passive learners.
1.4 Student-centered learning in traditional clinical training:
During
my medical training, the teaching of clinical medicine was problem-based and case-based. Students would be assigned cases
at random for ‘clerking’. They were expected to take history, carry out a physical examination, and undertake
simple investigations in the ward laboratory. They would then write up the whole case indicating the diagnosis, the differential
diagnoses, and a plan of management. The professors would listen to the presentation of the case and make corrections or ask
questions as needed.
1.5 Student-centered learning in the traditional anatomy teaching:
When I
was a medical student, the teaching of anatomy by cadaver dissection was very much student-centered. New medical students
would be given a cadaver that they would dissect over a year learning its various structures in most cases in the absence
of an instructor with them.
1.6 The experiences of the past 2 decades:
Over the
past 2 decades medical education has evolved into a specialty. Much research has been done on educational methods. Many new
experiments have been carried out. The problem-based method became widely adopted with many modifications to suit local conditions
such that there is no one monolithic approach.
Student
centered learning was in a way a response to the change in most societies from authoritarian command systems to participation
and sharing. Student-centered learning alongside problem-based learning empowers students and makes them active and not passive
learners and most of them feel good about these approaches.
2.0 MODERN CHALLENGES TO MEDICAL EDUCATORS
2.1 Medical information in the public domain:
The computer
and information technology of the past quarter century has forced medical educators to make drastic changes in both the content
of the medical curriculum and the method of delivery. Regarding content, much of what used to be taught as part of medical
education is now known in the public domain by lay people who surf the internet or watch health-related television shows such
as ER. Lay people as patients are more educated medically because they ask more questions of their doctors. This means that
new medical students already have a lot of general knowledge about medicine and will require a deeper approach that could
be vertical (providing more detailed new knowledge) or horizontal (integrating and explaining the various pieces of information
acquired).
2.2 Information technology and a higher learning speed:
Computer-based
teaching aids have helped increase both the speed and accuracy of learning visual information. Students who used to spend
months slowly dissecting a cadaver to discover the secrets of anatomy or poring over histology slides on a microscope can
now with a click of a mouse turn to any past of the body and study its 3-dimensional details in a matter of minutes. The fourth
dimension has also been brought into play in studying progressive physiological processes. Students can watch on their screens
in real but ‘speeded up’ time processes such as embryological and fetal development from fertilization to birth,
mitosis, meiosis, and protein synthesis.
2.3 Rapid change in content of medical knowledge:
The rapid
growth of scientific medical knowledge has challenged medical educators and I am yet to be convinced that they have answered
the challenges adequately. Medicine practiced 2 centuries ago was essentially an art and not a science and could appropriately
be described as ‘placebo’ medicine because it had few effective remedies based on our understanding today. Medicine
today has tilted rather too much from being an ‘art’ to being a ‘science’ because of the scientific
and technological revolution of the 20th century N. Since science and technology change and evolve at a breath-taking
pace, the content of a medical curriculum has to catch up which in practice means changing the curricular content at annual
or shorter intervals. If this were done, all stability and planning in medical education would become chaotic. The challenge
to medical educators therefore is to concentrate on giving the students the methodological tools they need to look for and
imbibe the changing knowledge base on their own so that they can be up to date. Stated in other words the curriculum needs
to be less content-heavy and more methodology-based.
2.4 Assertive and self-reliant students
Medical
educators will also have to face the challenge of the changing student body. I have already mentioned above that students
come to the medical school with a lot of sometimes detailed medical knowledge learned in the community, the mass media, and
the internet. They therefore expect more depth from their medical curriculum. They may not be content with learning the facts
of medicine; they would like to understand the interactions and relations amongst those facts. We are also facing the challenge
of the student’s age. Countries with a 5 or 6 year medical course taking in students directly from high school ran the
risk of producing doctors who appear too young to gain the respect of patients thus starting off their medical careers with
low self-confidence. The practice in the US of graduate level entry seems to solve this problem and is spreading in the UK, Australia,
and other countries.
2.5 A common foundation curriculum for all health professionals
Medical
educators are challenged to produce physicians who work comfortably in a multi-disciplinary health care team with other health
professionals on the basis of mutual respect. The system of educating and training the various health care professionals does
not prepare physicians for this role. The idea of a common foundation year in which all health professionals study together
was advanced to address this specific problem. Starting with the 2008/2009 academic year we have started such a program at
the Institute of Medicine at the University of Brunei.
Students of medical professions (physicians, nurses, physiotherapists, nutritionists etc) are taught together during the first
year with the hope and expectation that the camaraderie of that year will translate into mutually respectful cooperation as
practitioners in future hospitals.
3.0 ISSUES IN MEDICAL EDUCATION: and the rationale
for integration
3.1 Five issues
The following
paragraphs are adapted from a 1996 paper that I presented on conceptual issues in medical education at a conference held at
the University of Science School of Medicine at Kota Bharu, Malaysia.
I have re-presented the paper and taught its contents in several places over the past 12 years. It remains an essential milestone
in guiding and motivating my thoughts and activities in developing medical curricula. The 5 conceptual issues are: purpose,
integration, balance, service, and leadership.
3.2 Purpose
The purpose of medicine is to restore, maintain or improve the quality of remaining life. It cannot
prevent or postpone death because the life span, ajal, is in the hands of Allah.
Physicians’ primary aim is quality and not quantity of life. The aim of medical education is producing caregivers whose
practice of medicine fulfils the primary purpose of quality and also fulfils the 5 purposes of the Law: preservation and promotion
of diin, hifdh al ddiin; life and health, hifdh
al nafs; progeny, hifdh al nasl; intellect, hifdh al ‘aql; and resources, hifdh al maal. Hospital medicine
is most intimately related to the second, third, and fourth purposes.
3.3 Integration
Modern
medical practice lacks optimal integration. It is fragmented by organ, disease process, and is not holistic. This disintegration
is reflected in the medical curricula which if not remedied will produce more disintegrated physicians. An integrative paradigm
is needed to replace the paradigm that is atomistic, analytic, and not synthetic. The problem-based inter-disciplinary approach
to medical education is a worthy attempt to address the problem of lack of integration. Integration is not just putting two
or more disciplines together. It is a fundamental philosophical attitude based on a vision and a guiding paradigm. Criticism
of the fragmented medical curriculum is actually criticism of the underlying atomistic
world-view which is good at analysis and not synthesis.
3.4 Balance and equilibrium
In the absence of an integrating paradigm, modern medicine lacks balance and equilibrium in its therapeutic
approaches. Very aggressive and extreme interventions turn out to be the cause of new diseases and problems. We will need
to teach new paradigms of following the middle path, wasatiyyat; balance, mizaan; equilibrium, i’itidaal, and action-reaction, tadafu’u, in order to provide a conceptual framework for balanced medical practice.
3.5 Service
Medicine should be taught as a social service with the human dimension dominating the biomedical dimension.
Medical education should prepare the future caregiver to provide service to the community. This will require skills of understanding
and responding to community needs that can be acquired by spending part of the training period in a community setting away
from the high technology hospital environment.
3.6 Leadership
The medical
curriculum and experience should be a lesson in social responsibility and leadership. The best caregiver should be a social
activist who goes into society and gives leadership in solving underlying social causes of ill-health. The caregiver as a
respected opinion leader in close contact with patients must be a model for others in moral values, attitudes, and thoughts.
She must give leadership in preventing or solving ethical issues arising out of modern biotechnology. She must understand
the medical, legal, and ethical issues involved and explain them to the patients and their families so that they can form
informed decisions. She should also provide leadership in advocating for the less privileged and provide leadership in advocacy
for human needs.
4.0 AN INTEGRATED CURRICULUM
4.1 Over view
Over the
past decade several colleagues and I have been engaged in producing integrated undergraduate curricula in Malaysia, Brunei,
and other countries in the region. I have been guided by the 5 issues above in all these endeavors. I am working on a prototype integrated curriculum which is not yet completed. When completed I will be presenting
it to the curriculum review committee of our university where it will be discussed with other similar proposals in order to
make changes to our current curriculum. I take opportunity of my current visit to the King Fahd Medical
City to present the basic elements of this on-going with high hopes of
receiving feedback that will enable me make needed improvements.
4.2 Phase 1 curriculum map leading to the Bachelor of Health Science
The term
pre-clinical, used to refer to phase 1 of our curriculum, is a misnomer because our students are exposed to patients from
the beginning. Phase 1 lasts 3 academic years after which the student is awarded a Bachelor of Health Science degree. The
curriculum is basically health science-driven with correlations being made to 3 other themes: patient care (clinical), community
health, personal and professional development that includes research skills. After phase 1, students proceed to phase 2 which
is predominantly clinical teaching and at the end of 3 years they are awarded a medical degree.
Table
#1 shows the skeleton of the proposed curriculum and its 5 major themes. It is to be delivered mainly by the problem-based
method. There are however conceptual issues dealing with the structuring and classifying information that can only be delivered
by traditional lectures.
Horizontal
integration is the distinguishing characteristic of the proposed curriculum. Each quarter covers 2-3 organ systems. Then the
PBL cases tries to trigger all aspects dealing with health sciences, patient care, community health, personal and professional
as well as research skills relating to that organ system.
One of
the motivations for proposing this curriculum outline was personal dissatisfaction with the cases that we used. We acquired
these cases from an overseas institution and made some modifications to suit our circumstances. The cases tended to be more
inclined to clinical aspects and I felt that they could not trigger all the specific pieces of health science that the student
needed to know. The underlying problem being that the case writers did not have in front of them a detailed curriculum map
with specific and detailed learning items. The PBL process therefore could end with some gaps in the students’ knowledge
that we increasingly tried to fill by giving them traditional lectures. Since I was not satisfied with this reactive approach
I decided to propose a detailed curriculum map so that in the future we will write our own cases making sure that a case triggered
all what we anted to cover and that lectures were assigned in advances to cover aspects not triggered by the cases.
4.3 Phase 2 Curriculum leading to the medical degree
I have
not yet worked out all the details of this phase. The preliminary ideas I have is that the student will rotate through clinical
postings in the major 4 disciplines (internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics, and obstetrics gynecology) in the first 4 quarters
of clinical training. Then she will rotate through medical and surgical sub-specialties in 2 quarters before returning to
rotate through the 4 major postings in the final 4 quarters.
The routine
of the work on wards and at outpatient clinics provides a lot of free time for the student to engage in other activities that
continue the correlation with the 4 or 5 themes that were started in phase 1. An extra theme of community or family medicine
could be added at this stage. In this we can maintain the paradigm of an integrated curriculum all through the stages of the
medical program.
5.0 PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL)
5.1 Overview
I shall
in the following paragraphs present my experience with PBL in the past decade. I embraced PBL because I was intellectually
prepared for it as explained at the beginning of the paper. It also proved to be a teaching method that could deliver integration
and was student centered. My enthusiasm for PBL was tempered by a realistic understanding that PBL was not new but was an
evolving practice. This frame of mind left me free to observe, critique, and try to suggest improvements where needed.
5.2 The objective of PBL: content vs. method
In the
summer of 2007 I spent 8 days at the Faculty of Medicine, University
of Science and Technology in Sana’a conducting workshops on medical
education. I had lively discussions with the academic administrators and the PBL tutors about the PBL method. A recurring
theme in those discussions was whether PBL should deliver knowledge content or should be used to train students in systematic
thinking and systematic search for knowledge. Holders of the first view would minimize the role of traditional lectures. Holders
of the second view would deliver all content by traditional lectures and look at PBL as methodology training. In reality both
views are extreme and the truth perhaps lies somewhere in between.
5.3 Different forms of PBL
In my
experience in our institution and from visits to many other institutions there is no one form of PBL. No institution is like
another one because each one tries to made adjustments and modifications to the basic PBL structure to fit local conditions.
The need for modifications may be student or tutor-driven.
At the
International University in Malaysia we used a slow-release PBL format that was held in
2 sessions. In the first session students were challenged to develop hypotheses about the underlying diagnosis and then use
the clinical and investigation data released to them progressively and in stages to test the hypotheses until they narrow
down the diagnosis. With the tutor playing a passive role, the students were first given a clinical scenario with some clinical
data from history or examination. The next release depending on the case would be either more clinical information or would
move on to provide routine laboratory investigatory profiles that would be done for any condition: full blood count, and electrolytes.
Then they would be given more specific laboratory and radiological data that can help narrow down the diagnostic possibilities.
Where relevant, more specific investigation or testing information such as ECG would be given. All the information mentioned
above was released in a progressive fashion the students being asked to discuss the possible diagnosis at each stage. With
information release they could refine their hypotheses until they reached the final diagnosis. In the course of considering
the information while looking for the diagnosis the students would come across many issues that they did not know or did not
understand. They wrote them down as learning objectives. The tutor helped them organize these objectives into a meaningful
list that they would take away and during their self-directed student learning they would look up information and come and
present their findings at the next and final PBL session for that case.
At the
Institute of Medicine of the University of Brunei
we experimented with 2 forms of PBL. The first one started in the first year challenged the students with a clinical background
written as 1-3 paragraphs. The key words would them act as a trigger for a free to all exploration by the students. With the
tutor playing a very passive role they were left free to imagine, explore, and interpret. In the course of this they would
compile a list of student learning objectives which was in reality a list of the students’ ignorance. They would then
during their SDL look up more information and discuss at the next 2 PBLs. The last PBL was basically for conclusion and tidying
up.
From the
experience of the first 2 batches of students we decided to replace the open-ended PBL format in the first year with the slow
release format that was applied to all the years. The cases were local adaptations of cases from an overseas institution.
Students met in 3 tutorials to finish a case. New information was released at each tutorial. The information was a mixture
of clinical and investigation data. Students were challenged to develop and eliminate hypotheses along the way. The final
tutorial was for rounding up. Students had plenty of time on the weekly schedule for student-directed learning. Towards the
end of the week they had an experts’ session at which clinical and non-clinical experts would be invited to respond
to students’ questions on the case. They also had large session at which all the PBL groups would meet for a specific
learning objectives.
5.4 Example of weekly integrated learning objectives
Overview: The ideal of full integration of all the curricular themes in one PBL case
could not be achieved for various reasons. The first reason is that the case would be extremely long and unwieldy and being
written by people from many disciplines could fulfill the prophecy of too many cooks destroying the broth. The second reason
is that some aspects of the themes like statistics were skills to be taught and learned and could not be acquired by exploration
since they were outside the realm of common sense or general knowledge. In practice the weekly PBL case came to be recognized
as basically a health science one. The coordinators of the other themes rearranged their curriculum delivery such that they
would cover material relevant to or related with the health science issue(s) of the week. They would all however submit their
learning objectives so that a weekly set of learning objectives would be compiled as shown in the example below.
Example #1: Weekly learning objectives - Year 3
Health Science Leaning Objectives
1. Explain the physiology of menstruation from menarche to menopause
2. Explain the physiology of peri-menopausal menstrual function using your knowledge
of menstruation and ovulation
3. Explain the pathophysiology of dysfunctional uterine bleeding (DUB) and its
treatment
4. Describe some common physiological causes of abnormal uterine bleeding e.g.,
an ovulation leading to endometrial hyperplasia: adenomyosis, endometrial Ca, fibroids
5. Describe the anatomical, pharmacological and physiological basis of treatment
options for dysfunctional uterine bleeding including expectant management and medical / surgical treatment
6. Describe the physiology of the menopause and its consequences
7. Outline treatment options for menopausal symptoms including lifestyle, medical
and alternative
8. Explain the differential pharmacology of medical treatments for dysfunctional
uterine bleeding and menopausal symptoms
9. Briefly outline the symptoms of premenstrual syndrome and its diagnosis
10. Outline the procedure of hysterectomy and relate this to the anatomy of the
pelvis
Patient Care Learning Objectives
1. List important components of a patient presentations
2. Practice presenting patient histories
Our Community Learning Objective
- Discuss the presentation and management
of menstrual disorders in the primary care setting, including the psychosocial aspect.
Personal and Professional Development
Learning Objectives: ethico-legal-fiqh principles
1. Discuss the presentation and management of menstrual disorders in the primary
care setting, including the psychosocial aspect.
2. Describe ethico-legal guidelines on handling research animals
3. Discuss the purposes and relevance of animal research to human disease
4. Discuss ethico-legal guidelines for choosing animals for research.
Personal and
Professional Development Learning Objectives: Ethico-Legal-Fiqh Issues
In Clinical Practice
1. Discuss ethico-legal issues in use of HRT to treat menopausal disorders
2. Discuss ethico-legal and fiqh issues in dysfunctional uterine bleeding.
Personal and Professional Development
Learning Objectives: Case Analysis
1. Discuss ethico-legal issues in this case
Personal and Professional Development
Learning Objectives: Personal Development and Professionalism
1. Discuss the concepts and theories of communication
2. Explain practical guidelines for successful small
group communication.
Example #2: Weekly Learning Objectives – Year 3
Health Science Learning Objectives
1. Define pelvic inflammatory disease and outline the common causes
2. Define STIs, and list common examples
3. Describe the principles of management, mode of action, contraindications, risks and benefits of the different methods
of contraception
4. List the relative effectiveness of methods of contraception
5. Explain the mechanism of action of emergency contraception and list its risks and its efficacy
6. Describe the main chemical features of oestrogen and progesterone and their synthetic analogues and explain how they
exert their contraceptive effect
7. Describe how hormonal contraceptive preparations interact with other medicine given concurrently
8. Outline briefly the effects of androgens and anabolic steroid administration, including the misuse of these compounds
9. Identify the structures of the female perineum and give their clinical relevance
10. Describe the anatomy of the female pelvic cavity, including peritoneal reflections, blood supply and lymphatic drainage
11. Revise the pelvic viscera, including peritoneal reflections.
Patient Care Learning Objectives
1. Demonstrate understanding of the Handbook on Clinical Skills and the Reflective PPD Portfolio and the Patient Care
theme plan for Year 3, including the various means of assessment planned.
2. List the parts and the format of a medical history and examination important for a Patient Clerking. This is part of
documentation of written information on patients (only if applicable)
3. Identify factors in patients’ notes which commonly cause misunderstanding and might compromise patient care (only
if applicable)
Our Community Learning Objectives
1. Outline the issues related to the prevention and control of diseases of public
health interest
Personal and Professional Development: Research Skills - Sample
Selection and Data Collection:
1. Explain the role of sample size Determination
2. List and describe advantages and disadvantages of various sources of secondary
data
3. List and describe four methods of questionnaire administration with the advantages
and disadvantages of each
4. Summarize the principles of data management and data analysis
Personal and Professional Development:
Ethico-Legal Skills – Contraception
1. Explain the difference in legal consideration
between contraception as a choice of a couple and contraception as public policy
2. Explain circumstances in which female contraception
is allowed even if the husband refuses
3. Explain guidelines on choice of contraceptive
methods
4. Describe allowed male contraceptive methods
5. Describe allowed female contraceptive methods
6. Explain the legal position about contraception
out of marriage
7. Explain the legal position regarding sterilization
8. Explain how easy availability of contraception
causes sexual promiscuity
9. Explain demographic effects of wide-spread contraceptive
use.
Personal and Professional Development: Problem Solving
Skills – Contraception & Sterilization Based On a Case Scenario
1. Discuss ethic-legal issues relating to abortion without parental consent
2. Discuss ethic-legal issues relating to sterilization for the mentally retarded
5.5 Weekly integration of subject matter
Table Showing the weekly schedule (actual durations not shown for simplicity)
|
AM |
|
PM |
Monday |
SSM 1 |
SDL |
Comm Skills |
SDL |
Tuesday |
Lecture 1 |
Lecture 2 |
MIB |
Clinical & Communication skills |
Wednesday |
MIB |
PPD |
ECA |
Thursday |
PBL 2 |
Our Community |
Lecture 3 |
Lecture 4 |
Saturday |
Expert Forum |
PBL 1 |
LGS |
Lecture 5 |
.
The example
of a weekly schedule above shows the horizontal integration across the themes of the curriculum. The aim is to have the week
as an integral learning unit centering on an issue. Problems arise when more than one week is needed to cover that unit and
it proves difficult to sub-divide it in any meaningful way. Our experience has so far been doing one case a week with each
case requiring three tutorials on 3 days with SDL in-between. I however could envisage a situation in which 2 shorter cases
could be covered in a week especially to cover health science objectives.
5.6 Weekly feedback by students
At the
end of the week students make an evaluation of each learning objective on a 1-5 scale. PBL tutors and theme coordinators receive
and discuss these evaluations. The evaluation scale is as follows: 1= very dissatisfied, 2= moderately dissatisfied, 3= neural,
4= satisfied, 5= highly satisfied.
5.7 Personal and professional skill development (PPSD)
I can
talk with more authority on PPSD because I was the coordinator at the International
University in Malaysia for the
10 years I was there and also at the University of Brunei for the past 3 years. The aim of the PPSD theme is to equip the medical students
with skills that will ensure life-long professional success. Table #2 shows the PPSD curriculum map used in this academic
year. PPSD is integrated in the PBL system. It is case-based but is taught at a separate time slot from the rest of the PBL
system because it requires the tutor to be a specialist. This is because it involves quantitative skills (statistics and epidemiology)
as well as medical jurisprudence, fiqh tibbi, that cannot be handled by a non-specialist
tutor. These two areas require a lot of explanation for the students and unlike health sciences do not end with mere acquisition
of facts. The case used for the PPSD session is an extension of the case of the week but is written to trigger specific issues
in the PPSD curriculum map of that week.
Over
the past three years I have been experimenting with the delivery of the PPSD theme attempting to make it as student-driven
as possible. I either provide background material on ethical legal issues or professionalism in advance or ask the students
to search for it. In class the students take turns presenting that information and we discuss it together as a class. Then
we study and discuss the case of the week which is an extension of the main PBL case written to trigger PPSD learning objectives
of the week. Sometimes the PPSD sub-case is written up as a problem requiring statistical analysis to find a solution. We
use this as a vehicle for teaching statistical techniques.
5.8 Balance between lecture and PBL
At the
international university in Malaysia PBL was an additional method of education with main reliance being on traditional lectures.
We started the program at the Institute of Medicine
in Brunei with the ideal aspiration to
have our program 100% PBL but the reality dictated otherwise. We realized that three curricular themes (Our community, Patient
care, and Personal and professional development, as well as epidemiology / statistics could not be delivered fully in the
PBL based on cases whose primary emphasis was health sciences with clinical correlations. Attempts to deliver these themes
via PBL cases would have required writing more extensive cases with so many issues and triggers that the students would have
been confused. Lectures were therefore set for these themes. Practice also showed that the PBL process did not deliver all
the health science learning objectives to the depth required so we started having supplementary lectures. With time the number
of such lectures has increased as a compromise between the orthodox who wanted only PBL and the heretics who wanted a mixture
between PBL and lectures.
My personal
view is that health science content as facts can be delivered by the PBL process. However there are aspects that will require
lectures by experts. These lectures should center on conceptual issues of classifying and organizing various pieces of knowledge
and understanding the relations among them. The lectures therefore deal with the concept of structuring knowledge which is
a very important component of the intellectual function. Extending Piaget’s theory of structures of childhood intellectual
development, we can surmise that as medical students get more information and delve into the details of the human organism,
they organize that information in structures. As more information is accumulated those structures have perforce to change.
This change needs to be guided by a lecturer to avoid serious confusion.
5.9 Balance between health sciences vs clinical experience
Phase
1 of the curriculum is mainly health sciences with clinical correlations. We have been debating the right mixture of science
and clinical experience. There is no point giving too much space to clinical experience when students will have 3 years of
clinical training after the Bachelor of health science degree. My approach to the problem in the proposed curriculum outline
is to limit clinical experience to history taking on major disease symptoms, physical examination for signs of disease of
the organ systems, and investigations (laboratory and radiological).
5.10 Ideas on writing cases
Over the
past 13 years I have seen how difficult it was to write good cases. At the International
University in Malaysia,
lecturers were motivated to write cases. However it was difficult to get enough cases quickly enough especially since there
was a policy that a case once used would not be recycled until 4 years later. Case writers with time adopted a simple but
effective way of writing a health sciences case. They used a short clinical introduction and the information in the subsequent
slow release sheets was mostly investigations that gradually led to the diagnosis. Tutors’ notes were in some cases
photostat copies of relevant pages from a text book. At some stage I became frustrated with the writing process and had suggested
using clinical case notes from the hospital which would be reformatted and anonymized. I dropped the idea because it could
not get support from all the lecturers. There were also concerns about the confidentiality of medical records and whether
the hospital would be cooperative.
At the
Institute of Medicine, University of Brunei, we started off by adapting
cases acquired from overseas. The adaptations were mostly changing the cultural setting including names to be suitable to
the local situation. Cases were distributed among lecturers to make such adaptations. A few cases were also written de novo
attempting to follow the style of the overseas consultant. The process however continues to be challenging.
Any case
written reflects the academic background of the writer(s) which may be biased to some disciplines and not others. The way
to resolve this problem would be involving all disciplines in case writing which may produce the proverbial ‘too many
cooks spoil the broth’. The broth could be improved if each subsequent sheet in the slow release PBL case is assigned
to a certain discipline but this may break up the case into several cases that may not have a smooth logical flow and integration
that we would expect.
One of
the problems facing a case writer is to determine what triggers for various learning objectives to include without duplication
among cases and without leaving gaps in the student’s learning map. This prompted me to prepare the curriculum map presented
before. It can provide a basis for systematic coverage of the learning objectives.
5.11 The PBL tutor
The PBL
process cannot succeed unless the PBL tutors are competent but then this begs several new questions: why should the tutor
be competent if he is so passive in the whole process? Why should we even think
of the tutor’s education background if all he has to do is be a monitor? Why should we have a tutor at all if we can
trust the students to manage the discussions on their own?. The answers to these questions are not easy and straightforward.
The issue of the tutor’s academic qualification can be understood when we realize that the PBL process is integrating
many disciplines so it is impossible to find one person who can be a ‘specialist’ in each of the many disciplines
that are covered. We could also think of a pre-PBLworkshop for tutors to be equipped with the necessary briefing about the
case by a group of discipline specialists. The tutor will need this knowledge in the rare instances when he has to intervene
to bring wandering students from deviating from the set learning objectives.
There
is a role for a PBL tutor as an examiner that I have not seen being emphasized. The tutor observes the students’ learning
process. He sees areas of strength and weakness. He also is aware of which issues they understood well and which ones they
did not understand. Being a participant in an integrated learning situation the tutor is well placed to write examination
questions or to review them after they have been written. The writing of examination questions should not be left to discipline
specialists who did not participate in the PBL process.
5.12 Customizing to the culture
PBL cannot
be viewed in isolation from other contemporary intellectual changes in the world. Over the past 40 years all countries in
both industrialized and non-industrialized worlds have been changing from being authoritarian to being more participatory.
This change has manifested as more transparency and participation in the political arena, open markets in the economic arena,
and individual human rights in the social arena. PBL thus acknowledges that the student has to participate actively in the
process of searching for knowledge and cannot be a passive learner receiving knowledge from an authoritarian instructor. Viewed
in this way the PBL process is very progressive. It however has to face the challenge of medical students whose previous education
was teacher driven and authoritarian.
In my
experience our students were brought up to accept assertions and not to question. Their previous primary and secondary education
emphasized memorizing facts and reproducing them in the examination. They never had opportunities for analysis, comparison,
and synthesis of new ideas. They were therefore overwhelmed when thrust in the PBL process on entry into university and found
themselves challenged by a new educational experience. Some were able to make the transition and felt very satisfied with
the empowerment from the PBL process while others felt lost.
I think
that the PBL process is essentially good and should not be changed to fit the culture of the students. We however must consider
the cultural incongruity between the students’ background and the PBL process in designing our teaching not to rely
only on PBL to deliver the curriculum. This brings back to conclusions reached earlier that a few traditional-format lectures
still have a role.
6.0 ASSESSMENT OF STUDENTS
6.1 Overview
I have
always held the view that examinations create unnecessary tensions in the education process but we cannot do away with them.
The tension they create acts as a sort of motivation for students to attend class and to do the necessary work. The alternative
to examinations was used in traditional educational systems in which a student would stay with the teacher for a number of
years and when the teacher was satisfied with progress he would award a certificate, called ijazah, which in effect means permission to teach others. Since such an informal system is not possible in our
systematic education system we will have to continue with examinations because we cannot do without them. We however need
to think very creatively about innovative ways of assessing student progress without the tensions and other disadvantages
associated with traditional examinations.
6.2 Modern vs. traditional examinations
The examination
system must mirror the teaching methodology. The examination must therefore feature: being based on a practical problem, integration
of various disciplines, critical thinking and exploration as well as problem solving. The challenge of transition from the
traditional examination format emphasizing memorization and reproduction of specific facts to a system based on testing ability
to integrate knowledge and using to solve specific problems has not been easy but we have been able to make remarkable progress
and there is lot more to learn.
Preparing
examinations under the PBL system is a more elaborate task than in the traditional system. In the traditional system each
lecturer was asked to submit questions about the lectures given and the effort was individualized. In the PBL system several
disciplines have to work together to produce an integrated examination. This requires very systematic and consistent work.
When questions are written several long meetings have to be held to vet them. Model answers have to be written so that the
wording, the style, and the marking of the questions can be assessed in view of the expected answers.
6.3 The Short answer question (SAQ)
I have
sort of specialized in short answer questions. We always provide a clinical scenario as the stem. It served to focus the mind
of the candidate on a specific area of the curriculum. We try to include in the stem triggers for all the 5 questions that
we ask but this is not always observed sometimes one of the question, though related to the stem, may not have a specific
trigger. Over the past 2 years I have developed the practice of submitting questions showing the learning objective from which
it is derived or to which it is related. In the following example the learning objectives and model answers have not been
shown for reasons of space.
Example
of a Short Answer Question
The director of medical centers carried out an epidemiological study confined to patients in the TB
clinic and found a relationship between self reported obesity and self reported heavy smoking. The senior epidemiologist in
the Ministry of Health rejected the report and called it biased.
QSN1: Define and illustrate selection bias (2 marks)
QSN2: Define and illustrate misclassification bias (2 marks)
QSN3: Define and illustrate confounding bias (2 marks)
QSN4: Explain the prevention of confounding bias during study design (2 marks)
QSN5: Explain the handling of confounding bias after conclusion of the study (2 marks)
6.4 The problem-based question (PBQ)
PBQ is
perhaps the best examination format because it perfectly mirrors the PBL process. It is an assessment format that is difficult
for both the assessor and the student. Basically the question starts with a clinical scenario. The student is given some data
that is to be used to generate hypotheses about the diagnosis or problem being studied. The examination and answer scripts
are them taken away and the student is given additional information that can be used to generate more refined hypotheses.
The process is continued 3-4 times. In addition to solving the problem the student may be asked content questions related
to the case. It will be too long to give an example of a PBQ in this presentation but I am reproducing below a content question
I recently wrote for an assessment. Model answers have not been shown for space reasons.
Example
of a content question in a PBQ/mini-case
Mr.
Plumley is diagnosed as having had a pulmonary embolism which was large enough to cause homodynamic impairment. He experiences cardiac arrest
at 9.00 pm. There was no advance directive from Mr. Plumley regarding resuscitation. The physicians decided to carry
out CPR in the absence of informed consent. On recovery and against the wishes of his family, Mr. Plumley said in the presence
of witnesses that he would not approve of any future CPR procedures.
QSN
1: What is your view about CPR for cardiac arrest with no prior consent? Give reasons to support your point of view (3 marks)
QSN
2: Outline the procedure for a DNR (do not resuscitate) order (3 marks)
QSN
3: Explain a disadvantage of an advance directive regarding CPR (3 marks)
QSN 4: Explain the doctrine of clinical futility as the basis for a DNR order by a physician for an
incompetent patient (2 marks)
QSN 5: Explain ethico-legal considerations in cases of a DNR order for an infant born with a congenital
abnormality not compatible with life to adulthood (2 marks)
6.5 The Multiple choice question (MCQ)
The performance
of the students on MCQ is affected by background culture. Our students do not perform well as compared with my experience
teaching North American students. In examination post mortems students tell me that they have a problem choosing the right
answer because they are not 100% sure although they may be 95% but they lack the courage (or the guts) to guess with the result
that many questions are left unanswered. MCQ is therefore not a test of knowledge but also is a test of other skills the most
important is ability to make a decision based on partial knowledge or incomplete evidence.
At the
International University in Malaysia we tried to accommodate the cultural bias mentioned
above by using a form of assessment that some purists would dismiss as not belonging to the MCQ family. We wrote a stem that
had triggers for 5 statements and the student was expected to indicate TRUE or FALSE for each statement. We had a system of
negative marking to discourage guessing. We found that this approach was culturally more in tune with our students than the
system requiring choosing one correct answer out of 4-5 alternatives.
The following
are examples of questions that I used before
A. Visiting a person with a contagious disease is prohibited
B. Isolation of persons with contagious disease is
discriminatory and is prohibited
C. Discovery of a contagious disease in a spouse after
marriage is a valid reason for nullification of marriage
D. Discrimination of people with contagious diseases like
HIV is allowed because they are to blame for their disease
E. Excluding persons with contagious disease from
congregational salat is recommended
A. Excluding people with contagious disease from hajj is
not valid
B. There is no shari’at basis for imposing a
quarantine in times of an epidemic
C. Involuntary mass immunization to contain an epidemic
violates the shari’at
D. Involuntary treatment or prophylaxis in an epidemic is
allowed by the shari’at.
E. Destruction of property to contain an epidemic
is allowed provided compensation is paid
A. Forced relocation of the people in a medical emergency
is not allowed by the shari’at
B. Pre-marital screening for infectious disease is
obligatory for all couples
C. A spouse cannot refuse conjugal rights for fear
of sexually transmitted disease
D. Diagnosis of sexually transmitted disease is a valid
basis of conviction and punishment for zina
E. Diagnosis of sexually transmitted disease in a
spouse is a valid basis for divorce or khul'u
F. A spouse is legally liable for medical complications
of sexually transmitted disease
A. Wudhu and ghusl can be valid by wiping over bandaged wounds
B. A physically disabled person should pray as much
as she can and cannot abandon salat
C. Impotence due to paraplegia can be a valid basis
for nullification of marriage
D. Employment of the physically handicapped should consider
their condition and not compel them to do work beyond ability
E. Some physical handicaps like blindness and deafness
disqualify a person from being a judge
5. The following statements are true about states of altered consciousness
A. A brain-dead person has no dhimmat (legal personality)
B. A brain-dead person is considered legally dead
C. A brain-dead person cannot have legal liabilities
or obligations
D. Forgetfulness or absent-mindedness invalidates salat
completely
It is better
to delay salat and not offer it when in a state of semi-consciousness